FEBRUARY 2022
/*! elementor - v3.16.0 - 14-09-2023 */ .elementor-heading-title{padding:0;margin:0;line-height:1}.elementor-widget-heading .elementor-heading-title[class*=elementor-size-]>a{color:inherit;font-size:inherit;line-height:...
Integrating a Mutual into the risk transfer arrangements of a group company has the potential to deliver significant cost and capital advantages, whilst also benefiting from a significantly more flexible regulatory environment than is offered through insurance or captives.
Placements via corporate insurance brokers with corporate insurance companies inherently bring with them a myriad of frictional costs, which materially erode the total cost of cover. This can result in scenarios where less than half of the cost of cover remains available to fund the cost of claims, the balance being redirected to costs such as Insurance premium tax (which currently consumes 12%), along with the commissions, fees and other sources of broker payments, through to the profit margin mandated by corporate insurer shareholders.
Passing ‘expected’ claims into a high frictional cost environment is unlikely to deliver high value outcomes.
‘Expected’ claims are the types of losses which are experienced on an annual basis. Whilst individually they are all fortuities, their frequency and repetition means that they are not ‘unexpected’.
The most expensive part of any insurance placement is the primary layer, as this is where the bulk of claims activity is expected to take place.
The typical aim of a mutual is to retain all of the ‘expected’ claims (avoiding passing these into the insurance marketplace), whilst continuing to arrange insurance for the ‘unexpected’ claims (on both a per claim and accumulation (aggregate) basis).
If the members need to evidence insurance, the mutual can be structured as a Hybrid Mutual, the per claim insurance being purchased in the name of the members, enabling the members to evidence insurance, albeit with a large excess which is managed in their mutual. If advantageous, fronting arrangements could also be considered.
By capping the mutuals per claim and accumulation exposure with insurance placements, this enables the mutual to accurately quantify its worst case retained exposure, ensuring that this is within the risk appetite of the board of the mutual.
A mutual is owned entirely by its membership and controlled through a board which is drawn from within that membership. It is an entirely symbiotic environment, free of the conflicts of interest which come with third party shareholders, giving the mutual a singular focus of meeting members’ needs.
The cover offered within the mutual retention is on a discretionary basis. The decision whether to pay or not rests with the board of the mutual, meaning that the decision making process is entirely in-house, rather than being reliant on others.
Discretionary Mutuals have been a feature of the UK risk transfer marketplace for well over 100 years. One of the oldest examples is themdu.com/, with others having been around for decades, such as umal.co.uk/, and more recent examples including fric.org.uk/. They are used successfully by both the public and private sectors, and in a broad cross section of risk classes.
In a group company setting, the membership of the mutual is comprised of two or more of the separate legal entities which reside within the overarching parent company. This ensures that Ownership and Control resides entirely within the group.
The key advantages offered by a Discretionary Mutual include:
A Discretionary Mutual provides you with options in the way which risk is retained, managed and funded which are simply not available in the insurance area.
In a group company setting, being limited by guarantee means that the mutual will not have share capital, and therefore it will not be capable of being a member of a “group” for corporation tax purposes. If it is thought that it will or might be advantageous for the mutual to be a member of a “group” of UK resident companies for one or more corporation tax purposes, then consideration should be given to the mutual having share capital instead of being limited by guarantee.
Surpluses generated within the mutual must be used for the benefit of members, or as agreed by them. The typical aim of a mutual is to provide cost effective risk transfer, rather than the generation of profits, with pricing typically pitched at breakeven. However where surpluses are generated, these can either be:
The knowledge and expertise to design, build launch and operate the mutual can be acquired through the appointment of a mutual manager with the requisite skills, expertise and track record, such as Prospect Mutual Management.
The manager provides their reports and guidance to the board of the mutual (without requiring a seat on that board), and takes their instructions from them.
These can either be provided as a full service suite, or if you have existing capabilities which you wish to maintain, they can be provided as a gap fill and overlay solution.
Each group will choose the pathway and timeline which meets its needs, but this typically comprises the following four stepping stones:
Previous deployments have ranged from a one step process completed in under two months, to multi-stage processes taking over 12 months to complete.
We would welcome the opportunity to have a discussion with you, with a view to agreeing a pathway to explore, validate and value what introducing a Discretionary Mutual into the risk transfer arrangements of your organisation could deliver.
Take the next step towards optimising your corporate insurance strategy.
Contact Us for a Consultation
Prospect is a multi-disciplinary practice with specialist expertise in the energy and environmental sectors with particular experience in the low carbon energy sector. The firm is made up of lawyers, engineers, insurance and risk management specialists, and finance experts.
This article remains the copyright property of Prospect Law Ltd and neither the article nor any part of it may be published or copied without the prior written permission of the directors of Prospect Law.
This article is not intended to constitute legal or other professional advice and it should not be relied on in any way.
Further Reading
/*! elementor - v3.16.0 - 14-09-2023 */ .elementor-heading-title{padding:0;margin:0;line-height:1}.elementor-widget-heading .elementor-heading-title[class*=elementor-size-]>a{color:inherit;font-size:inherit;line-height:...
We are delighted that this week sees the publication in Wind Energy Network of the first of a series of ...
Judgment was given in August for this case relating to employment law in the construction sector, but published in November 2022. ...
Fly-tipping on farm land has been on the increase in recent years. It’s not just an irritating nuisance; fly-tipping ...
An interesting conference was held in Manchester in May on ‘Enhancing the Nuclear Economy’ organised by Nuclear Strategy. The conference ...
Our Energy Economist, Dominic Whittome, shares his Energy Highlights Report on oil, natural gas, and electricity prices in 2024. Delving into ...